ABSTRACT
Abstract: Microscopic measurements are widely used in scientific research and the correct equipment to perform these evaluations could be critical to determine study results. Regarding microscopic measurements, three of the most used methods are: Optical Microscopy (OM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and Micro-computed Tomography (MCT). It is important to select the best method for assessing diverse parameters, considering operational characteristics of the method, the equipment efficiency, and the machinery cost. Aim: Therefore, the main objective of this study was to define which is the most useful measurement method for assessing magnitudes below 0.4 mm. Methods: Ten dental implants, with known dimensions as defined by the manufacturer were randomly distributed. Two blinded observers assessed the distance between the second and the third screw vortex of the implants using three suggested methods. The true distance was defined to be 0.5 mm. Results: The assessed distances were: 0.597±0.007mm for OM, 0.578±0.017mm for SEM, and 0.613±0.006mm for MCT. The assessed distances were significantly different when the methods were compared (P>0.01). All measurements were into the CAD tolerances. Conclusion: It was possible to conclude that linear easurements between 595 and 605 µm could be performed by any of the described technologies (AU)
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Microscopy, Electrochemical, Scanning/methods , Microscopy/methods , X-Ray Microtomography/methodsABSTRACT
Os componentes dinâmicos surgiram como alternativa para reabilitar implantes inclinados em até 20°, possibilitando o restabelecimento da estética, função e reduzindo os custos do procedimento. Sendo assim, o objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar um relato de caso utilizando esses componentes. Durante o exame clínico foi diagnosticado que os implantes apresentavam profundidade gengival rasa, inclinação e paralelismo desfavoráveis. Dessa forma, foi optado pela utilização de pilares retos com componentes dinâmicos, que irão corrigir a inclinação do orifício de acesso do parafuso da prótese definitiva.
Dynamic components were created as an alternative to rehabilitate tilted implants until 20º angled. This component allows aesthetic and function rehabilitation with lower cost comparing to angled abutments. The aim of this study was to present a case report us-ing these dynamic components. The patient presented tilted implants with gingival shallow depth, with unfavourable parallelism. Thus, straight abutment and dynamic components were concomitantly used to correct the access screw hole inclination of final the prosthesis.